Sample Coastline Hotel is not a real business. This report shows how hotel reviews are split by topic, and how a decline in a single topic — breakfast, here — stays visible on the dashboard even while the headline rating looks steady.
This is a sample
The business name, reviews and figures here are fictional; they do not belong to a real customer or business. When the panel runs on your own Google Maps link, the same components show your own data.
Coverage: partial
Not every review was collected — results cover this sample only.
Sample representativeness: The mean rating of the reviews we hold agrees with the mean the source displays, so the sample looks representative.
Against the previous period · 250
6 reviews discarded as spam or too short
Percentages are of the reviews that were analysed.
4 reviews marked unknown and excluded from insights
Taxonomy v5 · at least 5 mentions · 95% confidence interval
| Topic | Positive rate | % | Mentions | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location — filter by this topic95%Interval 86%–98%60 mentions0 not separable | 95%Interval 86%–98% | 60 mentions | 0 not separable | |
| Staff — filter by this topic85%Interval 76%–91%92 mentions+1 not separable | 85%Interval 76%–91% | 92 mentions | +1 not separable | |
| Cleanliness — filter by this topic80%Interval 68%–88%55 mentions+3 not separable | 80%Interval 68%–88% | 55 mentions | +3 not separable | |
| Room — filter by this topic73%Interval 61%–82%70 mentions-1 not separable | 73%Interval 61%–82% | 70 mentions | -1 not separable | |
| Breakfast — filter by this topic56%Interval 43%–67%61 mentions-24 | 56%Interval 43%–67% | 61 mentions | -24 | |
| Price / value — filter by this topiclow sample58%Interval 39%–74%26 mentions-13 not separable | 58%Interval 39%–74% | 26 mentions | -13 not separable | |
| Check-in / out — filter by this topiclow sample55%Interval 35%–73%22 mentions-10 not separable | 55%Interval 35%–73% | 22 mentions | -10 not separable | |
| Noise — filter by this topiclow sample33%Interval 14%–61%12 mentions-17 not separable | 33%Interval 14%–61% | 12 mentions | -17 not separable |
Percentages are the positive share within that topic. Colour never carries the meaning on its own; every row states its rate and mention count.
The range beside each rate is a 95% confidence interval: a rarely mentioned topic moves within a wide band. Period-on-period change is tested with Newcombe's method for the difference of two rates; a change that does not pass is shown with its number and marked “not separable”.
Monthly
The vertical axis is scaled to 66% – 74% and does not start at zero, so the slope can make a difference look larger than it is.
| Month | Positive rate | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | 74% | 30 |
| Apr 2026 | 73% | 34 |
| May 2026 | 72% | 38 |
| Jun 2026 | 70% | 41 |
| Jul 2026 | 69% | 39 |
| Aug 2026 | 67% | 44 |
| Sept 2026 | 66% | 34 |
Against the previous period · largest decline first
Breakfast
61 mentions
Noise
12 mentions
Price / value
26 mentions
The components on this page render with the nalyzed dashboard's real code; the only difference is that the data behind them comes from a fixed sample set rather than a real collection and analysis job. On a real analysis, the same screens show your own data together with its evidence quote, sample size, confidence score and coverage status.